Camus protests far too much against Satre with his "rebellious" man that in the end becomes just another existentialist flop. Camus states that he rebel does not ask for life, but for reasons for living alas its creator does not offer any other to live for the sake of perpetuating the Grand Farce. Alas Sartre said that first/5(7) Rebel, The: An Essay on Man in Revolt. Hardcover – January 1, by. Albert Camus (Author) › Visit Amazon's Albert Camus Page. Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author/5(7) By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution. For Albert Camus, the urge to revolt is one of the "essential dimensions" of human nature, manifested in man's timeless Promethean struggle against the conditions of his existence, as well as the popular uprisings against established orders throughout history/5()
The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt: Camus, Albert: blogger.com: Books
A reconstructed conversation with the great writer about science and the absurd. The Algerian writer had graciously agreed, or so it seemed, to be interviewed about absurdity, the concept in philosophy to which his name is forever attached. He was as casually handsome as a film star off the set, though a tad overdressed for this warm night, perspiring in a gray suit and vest, his black tie undone. Arriving from his home in Paris, Camus was torn about New York.
Equally entranced and repelled by Times Square, he felt in rhythm with the midtown traffic, the gilded skyscapers piercing the blue sky.
We sat on a bench outside the bar as subway trains rattled along the track overhead. Camus smoked aimlessly. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. Celebrated for his novels, including The Stranger and The Plagueand his philosophical essays, notably The Myth of SisyphusCamus, seldom noticed by critics, thought about science and the scientific principle, and referred to them in his work.
He was a close friend of Jacques Monod, a French biochemist, who won the Nobel Prize for illuminating key processes in how genes manufacture proteins. Monod was outspoken, and not long after World War II published a scathing essay in the French newspaper, Combatformerly edited by Camus, of Soviet science, and in particular Soviet scientist Trofim D.
Lysenko, who maintained heredity resulted not from internal genetic processes, but was shaped by environmental forces; as a result, humans could intervene and modify plants and animals in any way they desired. I was anxious then, back in Brooklyn, albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt, to hear what Camus had to say about science, as he detailed his philosophy of the absurd for me. A day comes when a man notices or says that he is Thus he asserts his youth. But simultaneously he situates himself in relation to time.
He takes his place in it. He admits that he stands at a certain point on a curve that he acknowledges having to travel to its end.
He belongs to time, and by the horror that seizes him, he recognizes his worst enemy. Tomorrow, he was longing for tomorrow, whereas everything in him ought to reject it. That revolt of the flesh is the absurd.
In a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. Science that was to teach me everything ends up in a hypothesis, that lucidity founders in metaphor. At certain moments of lucidity, albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt, the mechanical aspect of their gestures, their meaningless pantomime makes silly everything that surrounds them.
A man is talking on the telephone behind a glass partition; you cannot hear him, but you see his incomprehensible dumb show: You wonder why he is alive. I think everybody has experienced that shock of clarity—the moment when the universe seems pointless. Yet all the knowledge on earth will give me nothing to assure me that this world is mine.
You describe it to me and you teach me to classify it. You enumerate its laws and in my thirst for knowledge I admit that they are true. You take apart its mechanism and my hope increases. At the final stage you teach me that this wondrous and multicolored universe can be reduced to the atom and that the atom itself can be reduced to the electron. All this is good and I wait for you to continue.
You tell me of an invisible planetary system in which electrons gravitate around a nucleus. You explain this world to me with an image. I realize then that you have been reduced to poetry: I shall never know.
Have I the time to become indignant? You have already changed theories. So that science that was to teach me everything ends up in a hypothesis, that lucidity founders in metaphor, that uncertainty is resolved in a work of art.
What need had I of so many efforts? The soft lines of these hills and the hand of evening on this troubled heart teach me much more.
I realize that if through science I can seize phenomena albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt enumerate them, I cannot, for all that, apprehend the world. Were I to trace its entire relief with my finger, I should not know any more. The sciences provide the most accurate descriptions of the world.
Science is windows into reality. You give me the choice between a description that is sure but that teaches me nothing and hypotheses that claim to teach me but that are not sure. A stranger to myself and to the world, armed solely with a thought that negates itself as soon as it asserts, what is this condition in which I can have peace only by refusing to know and to live, in which the appetite for conquest bumps into walls that defy its assaults?
To will is to stir up paradoxes. Everything is ordered in such a way as to bring into being that poisoned peace produced by thoughtlessness, lack of heart, or fatal renunciations. I follow. It is always thinking. So are you saying reason, when it shapes the world into a single mold, is absurd? Intelligence, too, tells me in its way that this world is absurd. Its contrary, blind reason, may well claim that all is clear; I was waiting for proof and longing for it to be right.
But despite so many pretentious centuries and over the heads of so many eloquent and persuasive men, I know that is false. On this plane, at least, there is no happiness if I cannot know. That universal reason, practical or ethical, that determinism, those categories that explain everything are enough to make a decent man laugh. They have nothing to do with the mind. They negate its profound truth, which is to be enchained. A horde of irrationals has sprung up and surrounds him until his ultimate end.
In his recovered and now studied lucidity, the feeling of the absurd becomes clear and definite. The rose petal, the milestone, or the human hand are as important as love, desire, or the laws of gravity. I said that the world is absurd, but I was too hasty.
This world in itself is not reasonable, that is all that can be said. But what is absurd is the confrontation of this irrational and the wild longing for clarity whose call echoes in the human heart. The absurd depends as much on man as on the world. For the moment it is all that links them together.
It binds them one to the other as only hatred can weld two creatures together. This is all I can discern clearly in this measureless universe where my adventure takes place. They want to describe phenomena, peel back clichés, and get to the heart of our experiences, no?
The spiritual universe becomes incalculably enriched through them. Thinking ceases to be unifying or making a semblance familiar in the guise of a major principle. Thinking is learning all over again to see, to be attentive, to focus consciousness; it is turning every idea and every image, in the manner of Proust, into a privileged moment.
What justifies thought is its extreme consciousness. That sounds pretty great to me. Why do you object to phenomenologists like Edmund Husserl? These paths lead to all sciences or to none. This amounts to albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt that in this case the means are more important than the end.
It confirms absurd thought in its initial assertion that there is no truth, but merely truths. The writer Sarah Bakewell has some wonderful insights into the phenomenologists in her book, At the Existentialist Caféwhich, by the way, gives you a top billing. But I see what you mean by the danger of personal truths. This moment in time feels particularly slippery. Everybody feels they have a right to make their own facts, and nothing holds us together. There exists an obvious fact that seems utterly moral: namely, that a man is always a prey to his truths.
Once he has admitted them, he cannot free himself from them. One has to pay something. A man who has become conscious of the absurd is forever bound to it. A man devoid of hope and conscious of being so has ceased to belong to the future. That is natural. But it is just as natural that he should strive to escape the universe of which he is the creator. It aims to enumerate what it cannot transcend.
It affirms solely that without any unifying principle thought can still take delight in describing and understanding every aspect of experience.
The truth involved then for each of those albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt is psychological albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt nature. It is a way of awaking a sleeping world and of making it vivid to the mind. For an absurd mind that is incomprehensible. How does a break between the world and the mind—as you define the absurd—bring us meaning and depth?
At this moment, albert camus the rebel an essay on man in revolt, too, the mind can leave the arid, dried-up path of lucid effort. That path now emerges in daily life.
He has forgotten how to hope.
Thoughts on Albert Camus' \
, time: 21:11Rebel, The: An Essay on Man in Revolt: Albert Camus, Herbert Read: blogger.com: Books
About the author: Albert Camus was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution. For Albert Camus, the urge to revolt is one of the "essential dimensions" of human nature, manifested in man's timeless Promethean struggle against the conditions of his existence, as well as the Camus protests far too much against Satre with his "rebellious" man that in the end becomes just another existentialist flop. Camus states that he rebel does not ask for life, but for reasons for living alas its creator does not offer any other to live for the sake of perpetuating the Grand Farce. Alas Sartre said that first/5(7) By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution. For Albert Camus, the urge to revolt is one of the "essential dimensions" of human nature, manifested in man's timeless Promethean struggle against the conditions of his existence, as well as the popular uprisings against established orders throughout history/5()
No comments:
Post a Comment